weekeegeepee

Monday, March 27, 2006

Cosmological Proof of God's Existence.

1. It is certain and in accord with experience, that things on earth undergo change.

2. Now, everything that is moved is moved by something; nothing, indeed, is changed, except it is changed to something which it is in potentiality.

3. Moreover, anything moves in accordance with something actually existing; change itself, is nothing else than to bring forth something from potentiality into actuality.

4. Now, nothing can be brought from potentiality to actual existence except through something actually existing: thus heat in action, as fire, makes fire-wood, which is hot in potentiality, to be hot actually, and through this process, changes itself.

5. The same thing cannot at the same time be actually and potentially the same thing, but only in regard to different things.

6. What is actually hot cannot be at the same time potentially hot, but it is possible for it at the same time to be potentially cold.

7. It is impossible, then, that anything should be both mover and the thing moved, in regard to the same thing and in the same way, or that it should move itself.

8. Everything, therefore, is moved by something else.

9. If, then, that by which it is moved, is also moved, this must be moved by something still different, and this, again, by something else.

10. But this process cannot go on to infinity because there would not be any first mover, nor, because of this fact, anything else in motion, as the succeeding things would not move except because of what is moved by the first mover, just as a stick is not moved except through what is moved from the hand.

11. Therefore it is necessary to go back to some first mover, which is itself moved by nothing—and this all men know as God.

Here's the sample arguments I showed in class today. Now try to convert the argument given above into its contituent premises, inferences and conclusion.

Labels:

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Fahrenheit 9/11.

YS:
Chanced across this link while looking for the video. The website has even organised the film into many segments, which will probably facilitate the whole process of looking out for each important segment. We can perhaps do the 5 qns on each of the clips, though i doubt we will have the time to do so:p.


07S06K: I agree it would be too much to do the whole film. YS has suggested that we do a class discussion rather than a group presentation. I think each group should lead a class discussion, using one or two clips from the website. Organize among yourselves so that the same clip isn't used twice. I hope to discuss at least 5 clips on Wednesday (29 Mar).

(Each clip takes some time to download — would Daniel email me a list of the clips the groups want to use, so that I may have them ready on my laptop before the lesson? Thanks.)

07S03D: Do you want to do it this way too?

PS: Don't bother to "join the discussion" on the website. The link leads to objectionable material.

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

Media Literacy (the full document).

This is a rather large PDF file. You might want to right-click, and save it onto hard disk before opening it. The most important bits are pages 22 to 32.

Labels:

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Reading Programme for General Paper.

A rough template for the weekly submissions.

Labels:

Sunday, March 19, 2006

Dictionary of the History of Ideas.

Check out the Dictionary of the History of Ideas. A useful, more reliable alternative to Wikipedia or Google, with the advantage of being regulated by a higher institute of learning (University of Virginia). A good starting point for research projects. I have also put it in the links sidebar.

Labels:

Friday, March 10, 2006

Holiday homework!

Answer ONE of the following questions. Your essay should be between 500 to 800 words. NO crap please.

1) Are civil peace and freedom of press mutually incompatible?

2) ‘Freedom of speech is a basic right – as long as the speakers do not abuse it.’ Discuss.

3) Advertising encourages a desire for products which people do not actually need. Discuss.

4) Can the media ever be relied upon to convey the truth?

5) People get the media they deserve. Discuss.

6) The mass media today is too heavily influenced by commercial interests. Discuss.


You should use material at the following links. You may of course use other material you have found on your own accord. If you quote these material, please indicate the source(s) of your quotes.

Cultural Cacophany: These are noisy times in the arts and media, but it doesn't mean we are dumbing down.

Excerpt from Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business by Neil Postman (1985)

“Screen-agers” and the perils of information overload.

Marshall McLuhan, the High Priest of Pop Culture: "The Medium is the Message".

Censorship struggles: The British courts seem to be getting it wrong about free speech on the internet.

Dialectics Of The Dais: Why is sport an appropriate avenue for the extolling of nationalism? What are some of the forms of nationalism that come through in the media depiction of sport and the Olympics?

For the Swazi media, HIV/AIDS is public scourge and personal demon.

Guardian forces government u-turn on freedom of information.

Journalists on the Controlled, Censored and Biased Media Coverage of the Iraq War. (This webpage collates articles from many different sources; you should check out the ones that pique your interest.)

Notes on the Construction of Reality in TV News Programmes.

The truth is out where? Honesty, media and politics.

Freedom from the Press: Why the media are the way they are (From Singapore: The Airconditioned Nation)

I want the essays in by the first GP lesson after the week's break.

Labels: