weekeegeepee

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Sing Dollar

"Singapore dollar

Legal Tender

From the information that the sites offered, I think that the joint currency is related more to the history that Singapore and Brunei shared, rather than a step towards a common market although they are reaping economic benefits such as increased tourism. It doesn't really seem as though they are working towards establishing a complete joint economy.

BUT I could be wrong(: so if anyone else knows about anything else, please post!"

- Jing yu

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Homosexuality in Singapore

Singapore's Lee Kuan Yew questions homosexuality ban

What are we to make of these uncharacteristically liberal remarks?

Mr. Wang's response

Yawningbread:
The oracle from St James
Highly paid moral weasels

Sometime back, there was an article:

Penal Code: Proposed changes 'relevant and compassionate' - says National Council of Churches of Singapore

For your convenience, Sections 377 and 377A of the Penal Code (Singapore):

Unnatural offences.
377. Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animals, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Outrages on decency.
377A. Any male person who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years.

Labels: ,

Monday, April 23, 2007

Denmark versus Singapore.

"Denmark, Finland or Switzerland... can afford a mediocre government."

A Danish citizen responds to MM Lee's "mediocre government" comment.

Labels:

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Nation or “Migrant City”?

Another interesting question:

Singapore, Forever a Migrant City?

Our forefathers from all ends of the globe coped pretty well then when they convened here, and so the nation prospered. Tolerance for diversity was in-bred or maybe, was sidestepped by the hunger for survival.

Either way, the impetus provided by the very intrusion of “foreigners” fuelled the economy and catapulted Singapore from an island let go by Malaya to become an independent, prosperous, thriving, and perfectly non-homogenous nation.

This comparison of “Singapore in the now” with “Singapore in the past” is somewhat fraudulent. I don’t think there was much of an “intrusion by foreigners” back then…

Let's have a look at our Immigration policy since Independence:

After independence in 1965, immigration laws were modified in 1966 to reinforce Singapore's borders as the fledgling country worked to establish its identity as a sovereign state. In fact, this task had begun earlier with the prohibition of dual citizenship in 1960.

With naturalization and the automatic conferment of citizenship, the total share of the nonresident population (i.e., those who are not citizens or permanent residents but hold an employment pass or work permit) in Singapore had dwindled to 2.9 percent of a total population of over two million by 1970.

Compared to now, where plans to increase the size of the population in Singapore to 6.5 million will clearly have to involve a huge influx of foreigners into Singapore, given our dismal birth rates.
Not to be blamed, the FT seems to be a more exciting, exotic and talented breed, and in some ways, even more attractive as life partners for some. Was it not the same in the past? Not quite I believe, or we would not have the Chinese, Arabs and Indians co-habiting here on the Same Small Space, no?

No, it was not the same “in the past”. I do not see recall “policies to import foreign talent” back then.

Assuming that the FT is indeed, more exciting, talented, and attractive, what does that imply for the general population of Singapore? Do we see a shift in the composition of the population in Singapore, from a unique ethnic composition of “Singaporeans”, to a “group of people who are exciting, talented and attractive”? A shift in values from fidelity to utility – “you are not attractive enough, therefore we should import foreign talents to make Singapore more exciting”?

To hedge this competition, I suppose we can only turn to a few options; one of them is self-improvement. I only wish there will be more avenues to help locals upgrade. And I look forward to such opportunities without the red-tape prerequisites of criterion/ paperwork/ qualifications/ experience/ self-financing capabilities etc etc. WDA is making rather good progress now and for a while more it seems, but there needs to be more stable and firm institution with easy-to-qualify provisions…

It is a false dichotomy – we can only upgrade, or be left behind by these foreign talents. I have yet to see a country that is composed only of “talents” as competent as the FTs we are trying to import.

Consider also the possibility of “structural unemployment”, discussed earlier on in class, about how certain people may not be able to upgrade, even if they are given the opportunity to do so (limited by their abilities). Are these people slated to be left behind?

Labels: ,

Friday, April 20, 2007

Unsecularisation of the State

The discussion in class about the unsecularisation of the state, and the revival of religion as a basis for identity and commitment, reminded me of an article in TODAY sometime back, in particular, about the status of the Malays in the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF):
Perhaps the most controversial claim by the US soldier was that "official discrimination against the Malay population remains an open secret" and those of the race are "systematically kept out" of sensitive areas.

"Mr Walsh claims that this has two major consequences: It "limits the involvement of the ethnic group most inclined to join the military" and it feeds the "perception of a second-class status among Malays, a fact which terrorist recruiters have taken advantage of before, and they may do so again" — referring to the Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) members arrested in Singapore for plotting terrorist attacks.

Addressing this charge, Col Lim said: "The writer's prescription for ethnic integration in the SAF seriously underestimates the challenges of building ethnic and religious harmony in Singapore"

"Singapore has made much progress in ethnic and religious in Singapore does not gloss over the fact that there is yet more to be done and addresses these challenges directly and openly."

Stressing that integration in the SAF would proceed in tandem with nation-building, Col Lim added that there are a good number of Malay SAF officers, some with higher degrees, whose studies were sponsored by the SAF, and whether a Malay SAF officer makes it to a higher appointment depends solely on merit.

In fact, Malay officers have risen through the ranks and held senior appointments.

"We have Malay pilots, commandos and air defence personnel. Those who have shown the potential to take on higher appointments in the SAF are given every opportunity to do so. Malay officers in the SAF hold key appointments such as Commanding Officer," said Col Lim.

"In fact, the proportion of eligible Malays selected for specialist and officer training is similar to the proportion for eligible non-Malays."

In fact, it may not be as secretive as it seem. Current Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew made a controversial speech on it many years back(taken from one of the comments on Mr. Wang's blog):
----

19 September 1999
The Straits Times

Reality is race bonds exist - SM.


THE community self-help group approach works the best for Singapore, given the realities today, said Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew.

The reality is that while Singapore has made progress in integrating the different races, certain emotional bonds are instinctive and cannot be removed overnight.

"When a Malay leader goes down to a Malay parent and says 'Look, you've got to do something about your child's mathematics... we're running these evening classes so that you can catch up', I think the response will be different if a Chinese community leader were to do that," he said.

There would be "automatic bristling" and the Malay parent would say, "Why do you think I am that weak?"

"Because the realities are such, we have found that these community-based self-help organisations work best because the motivation is there, the empathy is there, the trust is there." Asked by a polytechnic student if Singapore could overcome this and become a nation, Mr Lee said: "Yes, I think so, over a long period of time and selectively. We must not make an error.

"If, for instance, you put in a Malay officer who's very religious and who has family ties in Malaysia in charge of a machine gun unit, that's a very tricky business.

"We've got to know his background. I'm saying these things because they are real, and if I didn't think that, and I think even if today the Prime Minister doesn't think carefully about this, we could have a tragedy."


"So, these are problems which, as poly students, you're colour-blind to, but when you face life in reality, it's a different proposition."

Mr Lee said Singaporeans must continue to build social cohesion, and accept and trust one another. It is easy to acknowledge others, he said. "But to trust each other, say 'Will you look after my child while I'm away", that's a different level of confidence.

"We must eventually be able to feel as one united people," said Mr Lee in a speech at the Singapore 21 forum, in which he spoke on future challenges for Singapore in the knowledge-based economy.

The society must aim at more socialising between the different groups, whether in private or at community activities.

Progress will depend on how comfortable the young feel about one another.

"The more they socialise, the stronger the mosaic of our national cohesion," he said.

He noted that some letter-writers to The Straits Times had taken issue with community-based self-help organisations and asked why there was not a single statutory board for all races.

"That's a rational, idealistic approach but we've tried it, it doesn't work," he said.

He also noted that race riots occurred here only 30 years ago.

----
Let us revisit one of the links put up by Daniel earlier on:

The Charade of Meritocracy (on alleged discrimination against non-Chinese in Singapore).

“The discrimination against Malays has been discussed in parliament and the media, and is justified by the assertion that the loyalty of Malays cannot be assumed, both because they are Muslim and because they have a racial and ethnic affinity with the Malays in Malaysia and Indonesia. Current Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has historically been a vocal defender of this policy.”

In justifying this hitherto covert discrimnatory policy, Minister Lee Hsien loong noted in 1987 that, "If there is a conflict...we don't want to put any of our soldiers in a difficult position where his emotions for the nation may come in conflict with his emotions for his religion...they will be two very strong destructive forces in opposite directions"

Other articles you can read up on:

A question of loyalty: the Malays in Singapore

S'pore politicians hit Habibie 'racists' comment

Malay leadership: Interest, protection and their imposition

Labels:

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Nation or Corporation?

Not a long discussion, just an interesting question:
Singapore: When a country is no longer a country.

Why bond breakers left.

I made a point in class a few weeks ago, how the economic environment is changing.
1) Corporations now prefer to outsource jobs, instead of investing in training the employees they already have.
2) "Restructuring", "downsizing" (euphemisms for sacking people) mostly target older workers, whose higher wages make them by definition less efficient, ceteris paribus (a younger person can do the same job for less pay).
3) "Foreign talent" is imported to perform functions essential to Singapore's ambition to become a financial / biomedical / cultural hub.

I went on to argue that the economic environment shapes the social environment: people are conditioned to value utility over fidelity - both in the workplace and elsewhere, people are judged more for his or her usefulness than any other quality. This has an impact on interpersonal relationships, which could be the reason why families are getting smaller and more fragile.

(I noticed a quintessentially Singaporean argument in one of the essays:
Singapore's dependence on Malaysia for a key resource like water is politically disadvantages; Malaysia can use the threat of cutting off the water supply as leverage... As Singapore's industries is heavily reliant on a consistent water supply, cutting it off could be disastrous...
Um... PEOPLE DYING OF THIRST is also rather disastrous, imho.)


Mr. Wang independently corroborates the points about the economic paradigm.

Labels: , ,

Growth.

Singapore Growth Quandary: What's Enough? Land Reclamation and Influx Of 'Foreign Talent' Risk an Internal Backlash

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 16, 2007

Singapore's Relations with the Region.

Singapore and neighbors just can't get along (On the International Herald Tribune).

Labels: , ,

Singapore and the Effects of Globalization.

The First Tier of The First World: Beyond the Bottom Line.
This article examines the criteria Singapore use to define itself as First World.

What happened to Singapore, the land of plenty?

The same questions were asked, on Asiaweek.com (2002)

Again, the same questions, five years later (2007):
Singapore Swing: The island's economy is booming. So why are so many citizens worse off than they were 10 years ago?

Applying your Econs knowledge:
Quality of Life is more than Material Wellbeing: GDP as an Incomplete Measure of Singapore's Development.

Labels: ,

Saturday, April 14, 2007

The Thai Junta and the Singaporean Government.

The uses and misuses of lèse-majesté. (lèse-majesté on the Miriam-Webster Online Dictionary)

Defending the national scripture.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Two sites for you to explore.

For those interested in focusing the Globalization essay question, check out Managing Globalization: the entries are usually very short and pithy, with links if you wish to explore the issues more. Each entry will also have erudite responses from readers. You might not know enought about world affairs to follow some of the discussion - DON'T DESPAIR. Just keep exploring past entries until you find something that interests you.

The Online Citizen is good for those who wish to focus on Singapore issues for GP.

I have also put the links for both sites in the sidebar ------->

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, March 04, 2007

Government-People Relationship in Singapore.

Views on the relationship between the government and governed in Singapore.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

More Lies

From Reporters Sans Frontiers: Singapore Annual Report 2007

The authorities tried to browbeat the foreign press into submission in 2006, in particular the Far Eastern Economic Review (FEER). After the paper carried an article about opposition leader Chee Soon Juan, which it called the “country’s martyr” because of the numerous legal suits which he has had to face, the prime minister unleashed a series of retaliatory measures against the Hong Kong-based FEER. Lee Hsien Loong and his father brought a “defamation” case at the end of August against editor Hugo Restall and the magazine’s publisher. They were also told to conform to section 23 of the law on newspapers and the written press which obliges foreign media to recruit a legal representative in the country and to pay a deposit of 200,000 Singapore dollars (100,000 euros). Four other English-language newspapers the International Herald Tribune, Time, the Financial Times and Newsweek, all received instructions to comply with the same rules when their licence expired.


For your convenience, the relevant parts of Section 23 of Newspaper and Printing Press Act (NPPA)

(1) No person shall sell or distribute, or import for or possess for sale or distribution any offshore newspaper in Singapore unless there is in force a permit granted by the Minister to the proprietor of the newspaper or his agent authorising the sale or distribution of that newspaper in Singapore.
[sic]
(2) The Minister may grant the permit subject to such conditions as he may impose or may refuse to grant or revoke the permit without assigning any reason.
[19/90]

(3) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (2), the Minister may in imposing conditions under that subsection —

(a) specify that the maximum number of copies for each issue of the newspaper which may be sold or distributed in Singapore shall be determined from time to time by the Minister;

(b) require the proprietor of the newspaper to appoint a person within Singapore authorised to accept service of any notice or legal process on his behalf and on behalf of the publisher and to furnish the Registrar with the name and address of the person so appointed; and

(c) require the proprietor of the newspaper to furnish to the Registrar a deposit or some other form of security of such amount as the Minister may determine for the purpose of meeting any liability or costs arising out of any legal proceedings in connection with the publication of the newspaper.
[19/90]

i.e. the Minister is not under compulsion by law to impose these regulations. Note the year in which this provision was instated

Quoting Reporters Sans Frontieres again: (who in turn quoted MICA)

"We are rectifying an anomaly for FEER which has been a declared foreign newspaper since December 1987,” the ministry said in a prepared release. ”It was an administrative oversight not to have subjected FEER to the conditions which are required for declared foreign newspapers to circulate in Singapore.”

The FEER was duly served a Writ of Summons. (The FEER chronicles the saga here:

(Scroll to around the end of Lee Hsien Loong vs Review and Lee Kuan Yew vs Review for a list of successful lawsuits of the past, testament to their infallibility. Look around the middle, where Chee Soon Juan is mentioned, for reasons behind the summons.)

Faced with a ban since September last year, FEER has "struck back", according to the words of Asian Sentinel.

But importantly, let's see FEER's recalcitrant response.

Singapore's Founding Myths vs Freedom.

The Charade of Meritocracy (on alleged discrimination against non-Chinese in Singapore).

Financial Center Pipedreams (on Singapore's weaknesses as a financial hub).

More Reporters Sans Frontieres (sans the diacritics, technical limitations, sorry) stuff:
Singapore Annual Report 2006.

Singapore Annual Report 2005.

Labels: , ,

Monday, February 26, 2007

Lies.

The politics of judicial institutions in Singapore.

(Disclaimer: My linking the above website here does not signify any support for or advocacy of the opinions contained therein whatsoever. The article is linked here for the express purpose of exposing it for the litany of blatant and slanderous untruths that it is.)

Labels:

Friday, February 23, 2007

Family Values.

Some more perspectives on the family values issue we discussed in class.

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Censorship in Singapore.

A short review compiled by Ng Yi-Sheng.

Labels: ,

Monday, February 12, 2007

National Education.

BISSAU, Guinea-Bissau - When the government of one of the world's poorest nations learned that Whoopi Goldberg had taken a DNA test showing her ancestors hail from here, the news reverberated through the halls of parliament.

It was, the country's leaders decided, a chance to change the image of this West African nation plagued by coups since wresting independence from Portugal in 1973. If the world could only grasp that a Hollywood celebrity traced her roots to this forsaken corner of the globe, it could bring goodwill from afar - even fame for Guinea-Bissau, they reasoned. Read more.

...

A letter writer [to the Straits Times] said he found it hard to understand why Singapore strived so hard to associate with anyone famous “who is remotely connected to Singapore” and blow it up as among one of its own.

“Remember Vanessa Mae, the (renowned) violinist and how our local newspapers never failed to mention as ‘Singapore born’ when she just happened to be born in Singapore and spent only three years here. I doubt she could have the faintest impression of Singapore at her age.” Read more.

Labels: ,

Thursday, February 08, 2007

Managing online information.

“He (Mr Brown) should come out from behind his pseudonym to defend his views openly.”
- Press Secretary to the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts, K BHAVANI in a letter to TODAY newspaper July 3, 2006

“The identity is not important. It is the message that is important,”
- PAP MP Baey Yam Keng, Straits Times, Feb 3, 2007

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Singapore's Poor.

Article on Little Speck.

Some points of interest:

According to official statistics, at least 40% of Singapore's households saw their real incomes decrease from 2000-2005 - while the overall economy posted some of the world's highest growth rates, surging by 7.7% last year.

"The question is, who is all this growth for?"


Notice: because it is REAL income that has fallen, and not RELATIVE income, the usual arguments that "a rising tide floats all boats" (that is, economic growth benefits everyone) and "widening income gap does not mean lowered income for the low-income groups" do not stand. Indeed, where is all the growth going to?

"It is essential for us to tilt the balance in favour of lower-income Singaporeans, because globalization is going to strain our social compact," Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a speech last fall.
...
The country's mixed population of Chinese, Malays and Indians has accepted decades of the PAP's often authoritarian rule in exchange for phenomenal economic growth that has transformed this former British trading outpost into one of the world's most prosperous states.


That is, the transaction or contract - I (citizen) give up some of my freedom, you (the PAP as ruling party) deliver jobs in return - is breaking down.

"But what we're trying to do is to make sure that the widening income gap doesn't necessarily translate into a widening social gap."


What the hell is he talking about? Some other minister once said, in response to grumbles about the transport price hikes, the people will get used to it, and the grumbles will stop. Is that what the poor are supposed to do? Get used to being poor?

...consumption taxes, such as the sales tax, "are generally regressive and likely to compound the underclass problem.


Because the demand for necessities is inelastic, while the demand for luxury items is. -- You'll have to explain "demand elasticity" in a GP essay, though.

Labels: ,

Monday, January 29, 2007

MM Lee's dialogue with young journalists.

Remember last year when we watched the clip of MM LKY's televized dialogue with the young journalists? Remember that intense moment MM Lee had with Ken Kwek? Well (a little belated) here's the transcript, and an interesting comment on the exchange.

To relive the glory of the entire dialogue session.

(I can't seem to find the transcript anywhere online - someone email me the link if you know it. Thanks.)

Labels: ,